DADS Logo QRS Home QRS Search QRS Help Help us improve our website. Click here to take a short survey

Clairmont Longview

MapQuest Map 3201 N Fourth St
Longview, 75605
Gregg County
Phone:(903) 236-4291

Ownership Information: (definition)
Owner: Hopkins County Hospital District   (show controlling party structure)
Owner Type: Hospital District/authority
Multi-facility Chain: Yes

Resident Rights and Responsibilities:
To read about resident rights and responsibilities adopted by this facility, click on Rights and Responsibilities. Adobe Acrobat reader is needed to view this document.

Facility Description:
Total Bed Count: 198 (definition)
Accepts Medicare: Yes (definition)
Accepts Medicaid: Yes (definition)

Special Services:
Resident Council
Family Council

Overall Rating: 50 (definition)
From a maximum possible overall score of 100, the Texas statewide average for nursing facilities that accept Medicaid and Medicare is 55. The actual range for nursing facilities that accept Medicaid and Medicare is 6 to 100.

Complaints:
The table below summarizes substantiated complaints, which are those that inspectors found to be valid. The first row shows data about this facility, and the statewide average is shown in the second row for comparison.
2014 2015 2016
Facility 2 7 6
Texas Average 1 1 1

Potential Advantages and Disadvantages:
Nursing homes are measured on different outcomes related to quality of care. These outcomes may be indicators of the quality of care provided by nursing homes. Potential advantages are noted for homes that have better outcomes than most other Texas nursing homes on an item. Potential disadvantages are noted for homes that have worse outcomes than other Texas nursing homes on an item. It is important to remember that advantages and disadvantages in this case are only potential. The measures may be affected by factors other than quality of care, like the condition of the individual living in the home.

Some Advantages PAS - Potential Advantages Score (definition)
Clairmont Longview had more potential advantages than 56.931% of the nursing homes in Texas.

Clairmont Longview has the following potential advantages:

  • Some Disadvantages PDS - Potential Disadvantages Score (definition)
    Clairmont Longview had more potential disadvantages than 40.965% of the nursing homes in Texas.

    Clairmont Longview has the following potential disadvantages:

  • Investigations and Inspections:
    Complaints and incidents may be investigated during inspections conducted for the sole purpose of investigation. It is also possible for complaint and incident investigations to occur during an annual comprehensive inspection. The Investigations rating reflects only those inspections that were conducted at the facility for the sole purpose of investigation. The Inspection rating reflects only the comprehensive inspection.

    Out of compliance/No harm or jeopardy Nursing Facility Investigations (definition)
    Health
    (federal)
    Health
    (state)
    Life Safety
    (federal)
    Life Safety
    (state)
    Facility 2 2 0 0
    Texas Average 3 4 5 5
    During inspections conducted for the sole purpose of investigating complaints and incidents in the past six months, Clairmont Longview had 2 deficiencies cited regarding federal standards.
    Citation Detail Date Corrected Federal Deficiency Cited Residents
    Affected
    Severity of Deficiency
    Least=1 ... 4=Most
    Health
    07/13/2016 08/25/2016 The facility did not keep safe, clean and homelike surroundings.    Some Minimal Harm or Potential for Actual Harm
    Level 2
    07/13/2016 08/25/2016 The facility did not 1) provide 3 meals daily at regular times; or 2) serve breakfast within 14 hours after dinner; or 3) offer a snack at bedtime each day.    Some Minimal Harm or Potential for Actual Harm
    Level 2
    In addition, 2 violations of state standards were cited. Some of these violations may reflect deficiencies already stated as deficiencies.
    Date Corrected Deficiency Cited
    Health
    07/13/2016 08/25/2016 The facility did not keep safe, clean and homelike surroundings.
    07/13/2016 08/25/2016 The facility failed to provide dinner and breakfast the next day within 14 hours.

    Out of compliance/No harm or jeopardy Nursing Facility Inspections (definition)
    Health
    (federal)
    Health
    (state)
    Life Safety
    (federal)
    Life Safety
    (state)
    Facility 22 30 2 4
    Texas Average 6 7 4 6
    The most recent comprehensive inspection of Clairmont Longview occurred on 09/29/2016. Clairmont Longview had 24 deficiencies cited regarding federal standards.
    Citation Detail Link Date Corrected Federal Deficiency Cited Residents
    Affected
    Severity of Deficiency
    Least=1 ... 4=Most
    Health
    09/29/2016 10/29/2016 The facility did not immediately tell the resident, doctor, and a family member if: the resident is injured, there is a major change in resident's physical/mental health, there is a need to alter treatment significantly, or the resident must be transferred or discharged.    Some Minimal Harm or Potential for Actual Harm
    Level 2
    09/29/2016 10/29/2016 The facility did not protect each resident from all abuse, physical punishment, and being separated from others. (Provider requesting reconsideration.)    Some Minimal Harm or Potential for Actual Harm
    Level 2
    09/29/2016 10/29/2016 The facility did not 1) hire only people who have no legal history of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents; or 2) report and investigate any acts or reports of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents. (Provider requesting reconsideration.)    Some Minimal Harm or Potential for Actual Harm
    Level 2
    (Provider requesting reconsideration.)'>
    09/29/2016 10/29/2016 The facility did not write and use policies that forbid mistreatment, neglect and abuse of residents and theft of residents' property. (Provider requesting reconsideration.)    Some Minimal Harm or Potential for Actual Harm
    Level 2
    09/29/2016 10/29/2016 The facility did not hire a qualified social worker; or in homes with more than 120 beds, hire a qualified full-time social worker. (Provider requesting reconsideration.)    Some Minimal Harm or Potential for Actual Harm
    Level 2
    09/29/2016 10/29/2016 The facility did not give professional services that follow each resident's written care plan.    Many Minimal Harm or Potential for Actual Harm
    Level 2
    (Provider requesting reconsideration.)'>
    09/29/2016 10/29/2016 The facility did not provide a final summary of the resident's health status and a summary of the resident's stay, when the resident is ready to leave the nursing home. (Provider requesting reconsideration.)    Many Minimal Harm or Potential for Actual Harm
    Level 2
    09/29/2016 10/29/2016 The facility did not give residents proper treatment to prevent new bed (pressure) sores or heal existing bedsores.    Some Minimal Harm or Potential for Actual Harm
    Level 2
    09/29/2016 10/29/2016 The facility did not give proper treatment to residents with feeding tubes to prevent problems (such as aspiration pneumonia, diarrhea, vomiting, dehydration, metabolic abnormalities, nasal-pharyngeal ulcers) and help restore eating skills, if possible.    Some Minimal Harm or Potential for Actual Harm
    Level 2
    09/29/2016 10/29/2016 The facility did not make sure that the nursing home area is free of dangers that cause accidents.    Some Minimal Harm or Potential for Actual Harm
    Level 2
    09/29/2016 10/29/2016 The facility did not make sure that residents are well nourished.    Many Minimal Harm or Potential for Actual Harm
    Level 2
    09/29/2016 10/29/2016 The facility did not prepare food that is nutritional, appetizing, tasty, attractive, well cooked, and at the right temperature. (Provider requesting reconsideration.)    Many Minimal Harm or Potential for Actual Harm
    Level 2
    09/29/2016 10/29/2016 The facility did not get food from approved places and store, cook, and give out food in a safe and clean way.    Many Minimal Harm or Potential for Actual Harm
    Level 2
    09/29/2016 10/29/2016 The facility failed to obtain and provide drugs as needed or use the services of a licensed pharmacist.    Many Minimal Harm or Potential for Actual Harm
    Level 2
    09/29/2016 10/29/2016 The facility did not have a program to keep infection from spreading.    Many Minimal Harm or Potential for Actual Harm
    Level 2
    09/29/2016 10/29/2016 The facility did not make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable.    Many Minimal Harm or Potential for Actual Harm
    Level 2
    09/29/2016 10/29/2016 The facility did not make sure there is a program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.    Many Minimal Harm or Potential for Actual Harm
    Level 2
    09/29/2016 10/29/2016 The facility did not 1) review the work of each nurse aide every year; or 2) give regular training for the nurse aides.    Many Minimal Harm or Potential for Actual Harm
    Level 2
    09/29/2016 10/29/2016 The facility did not make sure that nurse aides show they have the skills to be able to care for residents.    Some Minimal Harm or Potential for Actual Harm
    Level 2
    09/29/2016 10/29/2016 The facility did not give or get lab tests to meet the needs of residents.    Some Minimal Harm or Potential for Actual Harm
    Level 2
    09/29/2016 10/29/2016 The facility did not have a detailed, written plan for disasters and emergencies.    Many Minimal Harm or Potential for Actual Harm
    Level 2
    09/29/2016 10/29/2016 The facility did not train all employees on what to do in an emergency.    Many Minimal Harm or Potential for Actual Harm
    Level 2
    Life Safety
    09/29/2016 10/29/2016 The facility failed to separate hazardous areas by construction that provides at least a one-hour fire resistance rating, and/or a sprinkler system as specified by the Life Safety Code.    Many Minimal Harm or Potential for Actual Harm
    Level 2
    09/29/2016 10/29/2016 The facility failed to ensure that the required sprinkler systems are continuously maintained in reliable operating condition and are inspected and tested periodically.    Many Minimal Harm or Potential for Actual Harm
    Level 2
    In addition, 34 violations of state standards were cited. Some of these violations may reflect deficiencies already stated as deficiencies.
    Date Corrected Violation Cited
    Health
    09/29/2016 10/29/2016 The facility failed to provide necessary information for a resident to contact his physician.
    09/29/2016 10/29/2016 The facility failed to have to written rules against mistreating, neglecting, and abusing residents, and mishandling residents' property.
    09/29/2016 10/29/2016 The facility failed to avoid hiring persons who were guilty of abusing, neglecting, or mistreating residents by law.
    09/29/2016 10/29/2016 The facility failed to make sure that all staff personnel reports suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of residents.
    09/29/2016 10/29/2016 The facility did not provide social services for related medical problems to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    09/29/2016 10/29/2016 The facility failed to provide quality services according to each resident's written care plan.
    09/29/2016 10/29/2016 The facility failed to give the resident a discharge summary that includes a recapitulation of the overall course of the resident's stay.
    09/29/2016 10/29/2016 The facility failed to make sure that each resident who enters the nursing home without pressure sores does not develop pressure sores, unless it is unavoidable.
    09/29/2016 10/29/2016 The facility did not give proper treatment to residents with feeding tubes to prevent problems (such as aspiration pneumonia, diarrhea, vomiting, dehydration, metabolic abnormalities, nasal-pharyngeal ulcers) and help restore eating skills, if possible. abnormalities, nasal-pharyngeal ulcers) and help restore eating skills, if possible.
    09/29/2016 10/29/2016 The facility did not make sure each resident is being watched and has assistance devices, when needed, to prevent accidents.
    09/29/2016 10/29/2016 The facility failed to have menus that meet the nutritional needs of the residents.
    09/29/2016 10/29/2016 The facility failed to provide each resident with properly prepared foods that have the most nutritional value.
    09/29/2016 10/29/2016 The facility did not store, cook, and give out food in a safe and clean way.
    09/29/2016 10/29/2016 The facility failed to make sure that a resident is given a psychoactive drug only medication-related emergency and with the resident's or his representative's consent.
    09/29/2016 10/29/2016 The facility did not provide drugs and related services needed by each resident.
    09/29/2016 10/29/2016 The facility failed to have an infection control program that allows it to investigate, control, and prevent infections.
    09/29/2016 10/29/2016 The facility did not make sure that staff members wash their hands when needed.
    09/29/2016 10/29/2016 The facility did not make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable.
    09/29/2016 10/29/2016 The facility did not make sure there is a program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    09/29/2016 10/29/2016 The facility did not 1) review the work of each nurse aide every year; or 2) give regular training for the nurse aides.
    09/29/2016 10/29/2016 The facility did not make sure that nurse aides show they have the skills to be able to care for residents.
    09/29/2016 10/29/2016 The facility did not give or get lab tests to meet the needs of residents.
    09/29/2016 10/29/2016 The facility failed to include a risk assessment, a description of the resident population including services and assistance they require, a section for each core function of emergency management, a fire safety plan in their emergency sponse plan, or a section for self reporting incidents.
    09/29/2016 10/29/2016 The facility failed to include a section addressing direction and control in the emergency preparedness and response plan.
    09/29/2016 10/29/2016 The facility failed to include a section for warning in the emergency preparedness and response plan.
    09/29/2016 10/29/2016 The facility failed to include a section for sheltering arrangements in the emergency preparedness and response plan.
    09/29/2016 10/29/2016 The facility failed to include a section for evacuation in the emergency preparedness and response plan.
    09/29/2016 10/29/2016 The facility failed to include a section for health and medical needs in the emergency preparedness and response plan.
    09/29/2016 10/29/2016 The facility failed to train staff on their responsibilities under the emergency preparedness and response plan.
    09/29/2016 10/29/2016 The facility failed to provide its staff orientation, training, and in-service meetings.
    Life Safety
    09/29/2016 10/29/2016 The facility failed to meet the Health Care Occupancies requirements of the Life Safety Code.
    09/29/2016 10/29/2016 The facility failed to maintain clean and pleasant walls and ceilings.
    09/29/2016 10/29/2016 The facility failed to make sure that its air-conditioning and heating systems shut down when the fire alarm goes off.
    09/29/2016 10/29/2016 The facility failed to maintain the sprinkler system components in compliance with the requirements of the NFPA code.

    Provider History:
    The following history shows any recent changes in facility ownership and also provides information on past regulatory compliance.
    Events
    Date Event Explanation
    07/18/2014 Change of Ownership There was a change in the ownership hierarchy that did not change the primary owner of the facility.
    Regulatory Compliance History
    Date Compliance Summary
    09/29/2016 On one or more inspections from 01/01/2012 to 09/29/2016, this facility was found to be out of compliance with regulations. There were no deficiencies that caused residents actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
    10/15/2015 On one or more inspections from 01/01/2012 to 10/15/2015, this facility was found to be out of compliance with regulations. There were some deficiencies that caused residents actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
    11/13/2014 On one or more inspections from 01/01/2012 to 11/13/2014, this facility was found to be out of compliance with regulations. There were no deficiencies that caused residents actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
    09/25/2013 On one or more inspections from 01/01/2012 to 09/25/2013, this facility was found to be out of compliance with regulations. There were no deficiencies that caused residents actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
    07/12/2012 On one or more inspections from 01/01/2012 to 07/12/2012, this facility was found to be out of compliance with regulations. There were no deficiencies that caused residents actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
    08/03/2011 On one or more inspections from 01/01/2011 to 08/03/2011, this facility was found to be out of compliance with regulations. There were no deficiencies that caused residents actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
    07/28/2010 On one or more inspections from 01/01/2010 to 07/28/2010, this facility was found to be providing substandard quality of care.
    08/19/2009 On one or more inspections from 01/01/2009 to 08/19/2009, this facility was found to be out of compliance with regulations. There were no deficiencies that caused residents actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
    12/30/2008 On one or more inspections from 01/01/2008 to 12/30/2008, this facility was found to be providing substandard quality of care.
    12/12/2007 On one or more inspections from 01/01/2007 to 12/12/2007, this facility was found to be providing substandard quality of care.
    10/16/2006 On one or more inspections from 01/01/2006 to 10/16/2006, this facility was found to be out of compliance with regulations. There were some deficiencies that caused residents actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
    11/17/2005 On one or more inspections from 01/01/2005 to 11/17/2005, this facility was found to be out of compliance with regulations. There were some deficiencies that caused residents actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
    10/20/2004 On one or more inspections from 01/01/2004 to 10/20/2004, this facility was found to be out of compliance with regulations. There were some deficiencies that caused residents actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
    07/23/2003 On one or more inspections from 01/01/2003 to 07/23/2003, this facility was found to be out of compliance with regulations. There were no deficiencies that caused residents actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
    10/31/2002 On one or more inspections from 01/01/2002 to 10/31/2002, this facility was found to be out of compliance with regulations. There were some deficiencies that caused residents actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
    08/29/2001 On one or more inspections from 01/01/2001 to 08/29/2001, this facility was found to be out of compliance with regulations. There were some deficiencies that caused residents actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
    11/22/2000 On one or more inspections from 01/01/2000 to 11/22/2000, this facility was found to be out of compliance with regulations. There were some deficiencies that caused residents actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
    12/31/1999 There is no inspection data for the interval 01/01/1999 to 12/31/1999.
    12/31/1998 There is no inspection data for the interval 01/01/1998 to 12/31/1998.
    12/31/1997 There is no inspection data for the interval 07/01/1997 to 12/31/1997.
    Information about staffing levels and federal quality measures for this facility can be viewed by following this link to the national Nursing Home Compare web site.


    NOTE: This web site does not reflect recommendations of any specific provider by DADS. It is simply a tool that you can use to help you make a selection. Because QRS shows information from a limited time period and is updated only once each month, it may not include some important events that are either older or more recent.
    Every facility listed in QRS either currently meets all federal and state minimum standards or is being closely monitored to ensure that known problems are being corrected in a timely fashion.
    QRS ratings and scores that are based on regulatory findings emphasize the most serious problem(s) identified during the recent past (12-15 months). These ratings and scores, whether favorable or unfavorable, may not accurately depict the provider's current performance. Note that ratings or scores based on regulatory compliance alone do not identify areas in which a provider demonstrates superior performance.
    DADS strongly encourages you to visit any provider that you consider, to talk with its clients or client ombudsman at 1-800-252-2412, and to contact the DADS Consumer Information Hotline at 1-800-458-9858 to obtain the most recent information concerning that provider.
    Last Update 11/22/2016