DADS Logo QRS Home QRS Search QRS Feedback QRS Help

Clairmont Longview

MapQuest Map 3201 N Fourth St
Longview, 75605
Gregg County
Phone:(903) 236-4291

Ownership Information: (definition)
Owner: Hopkins County Hospital District   (show controlling party structure)
Owner Type: Hospital District/authority
Multi-facility Chain: Yes

Resident Rights and Responsibilities:
To read about resident rights and responsibilities adopted by this facility, click on Rights and Responsibilities. Adobe Acrobat reader is needed to view this document.

Facility Description:
Total Bed Count: 198 (definition)
Accepts Medicare: Yes (definition)
Accepts Medicaid: Yes (definition)

Special Services:
Resident Council
Family Council

Overall Rating: 75 (definition)
From a maximum possible overall score of 100, the Texas statewide average for nursing facilities that accept Medicaid and Medicare is 59. The actual range for nursing facilities that accept Medicaid and Medicare is 0 to 100.

Complaints:
The table below summarizes substantiated complaints, which are those that inspectors found to be valid. The first row shows data about this facility, and the statewide average is shown in the second row for comparison.
2012 2013 2014
Facility 4 7 1
Texas Average 1 1 1

Potential Advantages and Disadvantages:
Nursing homes are measured on different outcomes related to quality of care. These outcomes may be indicators of the quality of care provided by nursing homes. Potential advantages are noted for homes that have better outcomes than most other Texas nursing homes on an item. Potential disadvantages are noted for homes that have worse outcomes than other Texas nursing homes on an item. It is important to remember that advantages and disadvantages in this case are only potential. The measures may be affected by factors other than quality of care, like the condition of the individual living in the home.

More Advantages PAS - Potential Advantages Score (definition)
Clairmont Longview had more potential advantages than 67.969% of the nursing homes in Texas.

Clairmont Longview has the following potential advantages:

  • Long stay residents at this facility are less likely to self-report moderate to severe pain.
  • Long stay residents at this facility are less likely to have indwelling bladder catheters.
  • Few Disadvantages PDS - Potential Disadvantages Score (definition)
    Clairmont Longview had more potential disadvantages than 38.446% of the nursing homes in Texas.

    Clairmont Longview has the following potential disadvantages:

  • Long stay residents at this facility are more likely to have depressive symptoms.
  • Investigations and Inspections:
    Complaints and incidents may be investigated during inspections conducted for the sole purpose of investigation. It is also possible for complaint and incident investigations to occur during an annual comprehensive inspection. The Investigations rating reflects only those inspections that were conducted at the facility for the sole purpose of investigation. The Inspection rating reflects only the comprehensive inspection.

    Total Compliance Nursing Facility Investigations (definition)
    During inspections conducted for the sole purpose of investigating complaints and incidents in the past six months, there were no deficiencies cited regarding federal standards.
    No violations of state standards were cited.

    Out of compliance/No harm or jeopardy Nursing Facility Inspections (definition)
    Health
    (federal)
    Health
    (state)
    Life Safety
    (federal)
    Life Safety
    (state)
    Facility 11 16 4 5
    Texas Average 7 8 4 6
    The most recent comprehensive inspection of Clairmont Longview occurred on 09/19/2013. Clairmont Longview had 15 deficiencies cited regarding federal standards.
    Citation Detail Link Date Corrected Federal Deficiency Cited Residents
    Affected
    Severity of Deficiency
    Least=1 ... 4=Most
    Health
    09/19/2013 09/20/2013 The facility did not 1) hire only people who have no legal history of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents; or 2) report and investigate any acts or reports of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents.    Some Minimal Harm or Potential for Actual Harm
    Level 2
    09/19/2013 09/20/2013 The facility did not write and use policies that forbid mistreatment, neglect and abuse of residents and theft of residents' property.    Some Minimal Harm or Potential for Actual Harm
    Level 2
    09/19/2013 09/20/2013 The facility did not develop a complete care plan that meets all of a resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.    Some Minimal Harm or Potential for Actual Harm
    Level 2
    09/19/2013 09/20/2013 The facility did not make sure that the nursing home area is free of dangers that cause accidents.    Some Minimal Harm or Potential for Actual Harm
    Level 2
    09/19/2013 09/20/2013 The facility did not prepare food that is nutritional, appetizing, tasty, attractive, well cooked, and at the right temperature.    Some Minimal Harm or Potential for Actual Harm
    Level 2
    09/19/2013 09/20/2013 The facility did not provide food in a way that meets a resident's needs.    Some Minimal Harm or Potential for Actual Harm
    Level 2
    09/19/2013 09/20/2013 The facility did not get food from approved places and store, cook, and give out food in a safe and clean way.    Some Minimal Harm or Potential for Actual Harm
    Level 2
    09/19/2013 09/20/2013 The facility did not have a program to keep infection from spreading.    Many Minimal Harm or Potential for Actual Harm
    Level 2
    09/19/2013 09/26/2013 The facility did not make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable.    Many Minimal Harm or Potential for Actual Harm
    Level 2
    09/19/2013 09/20/2013 The facility did not make sure that nurse aides show they have the skills to be able to care for residents.    Some Minimal Harm or Potential for Actual Harm
    Level 2
    09/19/2013 09/20/2013 The facility did not have a detailed, written plan for disasters and emergencies.    Many Minimal Harm or Potential for Actual Harm
    Level 2
    Life Safety
    09/19/2013 09/20/2013 The facility failed to ensure that doors protecting corridor openings are substantial doors that will resist fire for at least 20 minutes.    Some Minimal Harm or Potential for Actual Harm
    Level 2
    09/19/2013 09/20/2013 The facility failed to provide smoke walls that are constructed to provide the required fire resistance rating.    Many Minimal Harm or Potential for Actual Harm
    Level 2
    09/19/2013 09/20/2013 The facility failed to separate hazardous areas by construction that provides at least a one-hour fire resistance rating, and/or a sprinkler system as specified by the Life Safety Code.    Many Minimal Harm or Potential for Actual Harm
    Level 2
    09/19/2013 09/20/2013 The facility failed to meet National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) requirements for medical gas systems and equipment.    Many Minimal Harm or Potential for Actual Harm
    Level 2
    In addition, 21 violations of state standards were cited. Some of these violations may reflect deficiencies already stated as deficiencies.
    Date Corrected Violation Cited
    Health
    09/19/2013 09/20/2013 The facility failed to formulate, adopt, and enforce smoking policies.
    09/19/2013 09/20/2013 The facility failed to have to written rules against mistreating, neglecting, and abusing residents, and mishandling residents' property.
    09/19/2013 09/20/2013 The facility failed to immediately report verbally to DADS of suspected abuse or any other inappropriate conduct towards the residents.
    09/19/2013 09/20/2013 The facility did not develop a complete care plan that meets all of a resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    09/19/2013 09/20/2013 The facility failed to provide each resident with properly prepared foods that have the most nutritional value.
    09/19/2013 09/20/2013 The facility did not provide food in a way that meets a resident's needs.
    09/19/2013 09/26/2013 The facility failed to establish and maintain an infection control program.
    09/19/2013 09/20/2013 The facility failed screen employees according to CDC guidelines prior to providing services in the facility or require all persons providing services under an outside resource contract to provide evidence of a current tuberculosis screening the facility failed to document or keep a copy of the evidence provided.
    09/19/2013 09/20/2013 The facility did not make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable.
    09/19/2013 09/20/2013 The facility did not make sure that nurse aides show they have the skills to be able to care for residents.
    09/19/2013 09/20/2013 The facility failed to include a section addressing direction and control in the emergency preparedness and response plan.
    09/19/2013 09/20/2013 The facility failed to include a section for sheltering arrangements in the emergency preparedness and response plan.
    09/19/2013 09/20/2013 The facility failed to include a section for evacuation in the emergency preparedness and response plan.
    09/19/2013 09/20/2013 The facility failed to include a section for transportation in the emergency preparedness and response plan.
    09/19/2013 09/20/2013 The facility failed to include a section for health and medical needs in the emergency preparedness and response plan.
    09/19/2013 09/20/2013 The facility failed to provide its employees required information on HIV as part of orientation and every year.
    Life Safety
    09/19/2013 09/20/2013 The facility failed to meet the Health Care Occupancies requirements of the Life Safety Code.
    09/19/2013 09/20/2013 The facility failed to meet lighting and electrical requirements.
    09/19/2013 09/20/2013 The facility failed to maintain smoke barrier walls appropriately.
    09/19/2013 09/20/2013 The facility failed to implement procedures for storing and using oxygen.
    09/19/2013 09/20/2013 The facility failed to train its staff on how to release the locking device.

    Provider History:
    The following history shows any recent changes in facility ownership and also provides information on past regulatory compliance.
    Events
    Date Event Explanation
    07/18/2014 Change of Ownership DADS approved a change of ownership from CLAIRMONT LONGVIEW LLC to HOPKINS COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT.
    12/27/2008 Change of Ownership There was a change in the ownership hierarchy that did not change the primary owner of the facility.
    12/27/2005 Change of Ownership There was a change in the ownership hierarchy that did not change the primary owner of the facility.
    08/15/2003 Change of Ownership DADS approved a change of ownership from SUMMIT CARE TEXAS LP to CLAIRMONT LONGVIEW LP.
    Regulatory Compliance History
    Date Compliance Summary
    09/25/2013 On one or more inspections from 01/01/2012 to 09/25/2013, this facility was found to be out of compliance with regulations. There were no deficiencies that caused residents actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
    07/12/2012 On one or more inspections from 01/01/2012 to 07/12/2012, this facility was found to be out of compliance with regulations. There were no deficiencies that caused residents actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
    08/03/2011 On one or more inspections from 01/01/2011 to 08/03/2011, this facility was found to be out of compliance with regulations. There were no deficiencies that caused residents actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
    07/28/2010 On one or more inspections from 01/01/2010 to 07/28/2010, this facility was found to be providing substandard quality of care.
    08/19/2009 On one or more inspections from 01/01/2009 to 08/19/2009, this facility was found to be out of compliance with regulations. There were no deficiencies that caused residents actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
    12/30/2008 On one or more inspections from 01/01/2008 to 12/30/2008, this facility was found to be providing substandard quality of care.
    12/12/2007 On one or more inspections from 01/01/2007 to 12/12/2007, this facility was found to be providing substandard quality of care.
    10/16/2006 On one or more inspections from 01/01/2006 to 10/16/2006, this facility was found to be out of compliance with regulations. There were some deficiencies that caused residents actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
    11/17/2005 On one or more inspections from 01/01/2005 to 11/17/2005, this facility was found to be out of compliance with regulations. There were some deficiencies that caused residents actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
    10/20/2004 On one or more inspections from 01/01/2004 to 10/20/2004, this facility was found to be out of compliance with regulations. There were some deficiencies that caused residents actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
    07/23/2003 On one or more inspections from 01/01/2003 to 07/23/2003, this facility was found to be out of compliance with regulations. There were no deficiencies that caused residents actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
    10/31/2002 On one or more inspections from 01/01/2002 to 10/31/2002, this facility was found to be out of compliance with regulations. There were some deficiencies that caused residents actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
    08/29/2001 On one or more inspections from 01/01/2001 to 08/29/2001, this facility was found to be out of compliance with regulations. There were some deficiencies that caused residents actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
    11/22/2000 On one or more inspections from 01/01/2000 to 11/22/2000, this facility was found to be out of compliance with regulations. There were some deficiencies that caused residents actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
    12/31/1999 There is no inspection data for the interval 01/01/1999 to 12/31/1999.
    12/31/1998 There is no inspection data for the interval 01/01/1998 to 12/31/1998.
    12/31/1997 There is no inspection data for the interval 07/01/1997 to 12/31/1997.
    Information about staffing levels and federal quality measures for this facility can be viewed by following this link to the national Nursing Home Compare web site.


    NOTE: This web site does not reflect recommendations of any specific provider by DADS. It is simply a tool that you can use to help you make a selection. Because QRS shows information from a limited time period and is updated only once each month, it may not include some important events that are either older or more recent.
    Every facility listed in QRS either currently meets all federal and state minimum standards or is being closely monitored to ensure that known problems are being corrected in a timely fashion.
    QRS ratings and scores that are based on regulatory findings emphasize the most serious problem(s) identified during the recent past (12-15 months). These ratings and scores, whether favorable or unfavorable, may not accurately depict the provider's current performance. Note that ratings or scores based on regulatory compliance alone do not identify areas in which a provider demonstrates superior performance.
    DADS strongly encourages you to visit any provider that you consider, to talk with its clients or client ombudsman at 1-800-252-2412, and to contact the DADS Consumer Information Hotline at 1-800-458-9858 to obtain the most recent information concerning that provider.
    Last Update 08/18/2014