DADS Logo QRS Home QRS Search QRS Help Help us improve our website. Click here to take a short survey

Parkview Nursing And Rehabilitation Center

MapQuest Map 1501 S Main St
Lockhart, 78644
Caldwell County
Phone:(512) 398-2362

Ownership Information: (definition)
Owner: Pinnacle Health Facilities XIX LP   (show controlling party structure)
Owner Type: Limited Partnership
Multi-facility Chain: No

Resident Rights and Responsibilities:
To read about resident rights and responsibilities adopted by this facility, click on Rights and Responsibilities. Adobe Acrobat reader is needed to view this document.

Facility Description:
Total Bed Count: 118 (definition)
Accepts Medicare: Yes (definition)
Accepts Medicaid: Yes (definition)

Special Services:
Resident Council

Overall Rating: 50 (definition)
From a maximum possible overall score of 100, the Texas statewide average for nursing facilities that accept Medicaid and Medicare is 58. The actual range for nursing facilities that accept Medicaid and Medicare is 6 to 100.

Complaints:
The table below summarizes substantiated complaints, which are those that inspectors found to be valid. The first row shows data about this facility, and the statewide average is shown in the second row for comparison.
2015 2016 2017
Facility 1 1 0
Texas Average 1 1 0

Potential Advantages and Disadvantages:
Nursing homes are measured on different outcomes related to quality of care. These outcomes may be indicators of the quality of care provided by nursing homes. Potential advantages are noted for homes that have better outcomes than most other Texas nursing homes on an item. Potential disadvantages are noted for homes that have worse outcomes than other Texas nursing homes on an item. It is important to remember that advantages and disadvantages in this case are only potential. The measures may be affected by factors other than quality of care, like the condition of the individual living in the home.

Fewer Advantages PAS - Potential Advantages Score (definition)
Parkview Nursing And Rehabilitation Center is comparable to 23.936% of the nursing homes in Texas.

Parkview Nursing And Rehabilitation Center has no identifiable potential advantages.

More Disadvantages PDS - Potential Disadvantages Score (definition)
Parkview Nursing And Rehabilitation Center had more potential disadvantages than 66.448% of the nursing homes in Texas.

Parkview Nursing And Rehabilitation Center has the following potential disadvantages:

  • Long stay residents at this facility are more likely to have urinary tract infections.
  • Short stay residents at this facility are more likely to receive antipsychotic medication.
  • Investigations and Inspections:
    Complaints and incidents may be investigated during inspections conducted for the sole purpose of investigation. It is also possible for complaint and incident investigations to occur during an annual comprehensive inspection. The Investigations rating reflects only those inspections that were conducted at the facility for the sole purpose of investigation. The Inspection rating reflects only the comprehensive inspection.

    Total Compliance Nursing Facility Investigations (definition)
    During inspections conducted for the sole purpose of investigating complaints and incidents in the past six months, there were no deficiencies cited regarding federal standards.
    No violations of state standards were cited.

    Out of compliance/No harm or jeopardy Nursing Facility Inspections (definition)
    Health
    (federal)
    Health
    (state)
    Life Safety
    (federal)
    Life Safety
    (state)
    Facility 12 13 0 5
    Texas Average 6 7 4 6
    The most recent comprehensive inspection of Parkview Nursing And Rehabilitation Center occurred on 04/26/2017. Parkview Nursing And Rehabilitation Center had 12 deficiencies cited regarding federal standards.
    Citation Detail Link Date Corrected Federal Deficiency Cited Residents
    Affected
    Severity of Deficiency
    Least=1 ... 4=Most
    Health
    04/26/2017 The facility did not keep each resident's personal and medical records private and confidential.    Some Minimal Harm or Potential for Actual Harm
    Level 2
    04/26/2017 The facility did not do a new assessment after any major change in a resident's physical or mental health.    Some Minimal Harm or Potential for Actual Harm
    Level 2
    04/26/2017 The facility did not develop a complete care plan that meets all of a resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.    Some Minimal Harm or Potential for Actual Harm
    Level 2
    04/26/2017 The facility did not make sure that residents who cannot care for themselves receive help with eating/drinking, grooming and hygiene.    Some Minimal Harm or Potential for Actual Harm
    Level 2
    04/26/2017 The facility did not make sure that residents with reduced range of motion get proper treatment and services to increase range of motion.    Some Minimal Harm or Potential for Actual Harm
    Level 2
    04/26/2017 The facility did not give the right treatment and services to residents who have mental or social problems adjusting.    Some Minimal Harm or Potential for Actual Harm
    Level 2
    04/26/2017 The facility did not properly care for residents needing special services, including: injections, colostomy, ureostomy, ileostomy, tracheostomy care, tracheal suctioning, respiratory care, foot care, and prostheses.    Some Minimal Harm or Potential for Actual Harm
    Level 2
    04/26/2017 The facility did not get food from approved places and store, cook, and give out food in a safe and clean way.    Many Minimal Harm or Potential for Actual Harm
    Level 2
    04/26/2017 The facility failed to obtain and provide drugs as needed or use the services of a licensed pharmacist.    Some Minimal Harm or Potential for Actual Harm
    Level 2
    04/26/2017 The facility did not have a program to keep infection from spreading.    Some Minimal Harm or Potential for Actual Harm
    Level 2
    04/26/2017 The facility did not provide bedrooms that don't allow residents to see each other when privacy is needed.    Some Minimal Harm or Potential for Actual Harm
    Level 2
    04/26/2017 The facility did not keep accurate and appropriate records.    Some Minimal Harm or Potential for Actual Harm
    Level 2
    In addition, 18 violations of state standards were cited. Some of these violations may reflect deficiencies already stated as deficiencies.
    Date Corrected Violation Cited
    Health
    04/26/2017 The facility failed to protect the residents' personal privacy.
    04/26/2017 The facility did not do an assessment of the resident every year.
    04/26/2017 The facility failed to include in the care plan services that will be provided to the resident.
    04/26/2017 The facility did not make sure that residents who cannot care for themselves receive help with eating/drinking, grooming and hygiene.
    04/26/2017 The facility did not make sure that residents with reduced range of motion get proper treatment and services to increase range of motion.
    04/26/2017 The facility did not give the right treatment and services to residents who have mental or social problems adjusting.
    04/26/2017 The facility did not properly care for residents needing special services, including: injections, colostomy, ureterostomy, ileostomy, tracheostomy care, tracheal suctioning, respiratory care, foot care, and prostheses.
    04/26/2017 The facility did not store, cook, and give out food in a safe and clean way.
    04/26/2017 The facility did not provide drugs and related services needed by each resident.
    04/26/2017 The facility failed to keep residents' drugs used externally separately from those used internally and to store poisons separately from all drugs.
    04/26/2017 The facility failed to establish and maintain an infection control program.
    04/26/2017 The facility did not make sure that staff members wash their hands when needed.
    04/26/2017 The facility did not keep accurate and appropriate records.
    Life Safety
    04/26/2017 The facility failed to meet related codes and standards of the Life Safety Code.
    04/26/2017 The facility failed to maintain clean and pleasant walls and ceilings.
    04/26/2017 The facility failed to provide general and specific storage areas as needed.
    04/26/2017 The facility failed to use electrical extension cords or multi-receptacle plug-in adaptors as a substitute for approved wiring methods in the facility.
    04/26/2017 The facility failed to have locks on the control doors that release when power goes off in the facility.

    Provider History:
    The following history shows any recent changes in facility ownership and also provides information on past regulatory compliance.
    Events
    Date Event Explanation
    09/01/2010 Change of Ownership There was a change in the ownership hierarchy that did not change the primary owner of the facility.
    Regulatory Compliance History
    Date Compliance Summary
    04/26/2017 On one or more inspections from 01/01/2017 to 04/26/2017, this facility was found to be out of compliance with regulations. There were no deficiencies that caused residents actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
    10/12/2016 On one or more inspections from 01/01/2016 to 10/12/2016, this facility was found to be out of compliance with regulations. There were no deficiencies that caused residents actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
    01/30/2015 On one or more inspections from 01/01/2015 to 01/30/2015, this facility was found to be out of compliance with regulations. There were no deficiencies that caused residents actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
    10/31/2014 On one or more inspections from 01/01/2014 to 10/31/2014, this facility was found to be out of compliance with regulations. There were no deficiencies that caused residents actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
    12/30/2013 On one or more inspections from 01/01/2013 to 12/30/2013, this facility was found to be out of compliance with regulations. There were some deficiencies that caused residents actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
    10/12/2012 On all inspections from 01/01/2012 to 10/12/2012, this facility was in substantial compliance with regulations.
    11/09/2011 On one or more inspections from 01/01/2011 to 11/09/2011, this facility was found to be providing substandard quality of care.
    08/27/2010 On one or more inspections from 01/01/2010 to 08/27/2010, this facility was found to be out of compliance with regulations. There were no deficiencies that caused residents actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
    07/17/2009 On one or more inspections from 01/01/2009 to 07/17/2009, this facility was found to be out of compliance with regulations. There were no deficiencies that caused residents actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
    09/04/2008 On one or more inspections from 01/01/2008 to 09/04/2008, this facility was found to be providing substandard quality of care.
    06/08/2007 On one or more inspections from 01/01/2007 to 06/08/2007, this facility was found to be out of compliance with regulations. There were no deficiencies that caused residents actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
    05/05/2006 On one or more inspections from 01/01/2006 to 05/05/2006, this facility was found to be out of compliance with regulations. There were some deficiencies that caused residents actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
    02/25/2005 On one or more inspections from 01/01/2005 to 02/25/2005, this facility was found to be out of compliance with regulations. There were no deficiencies that caused residents actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
    03/05/2004 On one or more inspections from 01/01/2004 to 03/05/2004, this facility was found to be out of compliance with regulations. There were no deficiencies that caused residents actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
    12/31/2003 There is no inspection data for the interval 01/01/2003 to 12/31/2003.
    12/19/2002 On one or more inspections from 01/01/2002 to 12/19/2002, this facility was found to be out of compliance with regulations. There were some deficiencies that caused residents actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
    10/19/2001 On one or more inspections from 01/01/2001 to 10/19/2001, this facility was found to be out of compliance with regulations. There were no deficiencies that caused residents actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
    12/31/2000 There is no inspection data for the interval 01/01/2000 to 12/31/2000.
    12/31/1999 There is no inspection data for the interval 01/01/1999 to 12/31/1999.
    12/31/1998 There is no inspection data for the interval 01/01/1998 to 12/31/1998.
    12/31/1997 There is no inspection data for the interval 07/01/1997 to 12/31/1997.
    Information about staffing levels and federal quality measures for this facility can be viewed by following this link to the national Nursing Home Compare web site.


    NOTE: This web site does not reflect recommendations of any specific provider by DADS. It is simply a tool that you can use to help you make a selection. Because QRS shows information from a limited time period and is updated only once each month, it may not include some important events that are either older or more recent.
    Every facility listed in QRS either currently meets all federal and state minimum standards or is being closely monitored to ensure that known problems are being corrected in a timely fashion.
    QRS ratings and scores that are based on regulatory findings emphasize the most serious problem(s) identified during the recent past (12-15 months). These ratings and scores, whether favorable or unfavorable, may not accurately depict the provider's current performance. Note that ratings or scores based on regulatory compliance alone do not identify areas in which a provider demonstrates superior performance.
    To obtain the most recent information about a provider, contact DADS Consumer Information Hotline at 1-800-458-9858, or click this link for additional information: DADS Consumer Information . For general inquiries, send an email to LTCSearch@hhsc.state.tx.us.
    Last Update 05/24/2017